Imagine your favorite built environment. It could be a place you’ve experienced once, or one you occupy everyday. Now close your eyes, and put yourself in that space. What do you see? What emotions do you feel? What in your space makes you feel this way? Is it a set of large windows that flood light in? Are there natural materials used to make you feel grounded, almost as if you’re outside? Is there artwork that transcends you beyond the space? Or does the layout of the room bring a sense of connectedness and safety for you and others who get to occupy the space? What colors do you see? What do you hear? What do you smell? These are a few, among many, important questions a designer and developer must understand when creating a space that is trauma-informed for both supportive and affordable housing developments. Not every space humans occupy can be safe and comfortable, but the space one lives in must be. In the same light, no space should cause further detriment to an already unfortunate situation someone is in.
Now, think of a space that you find yourself dreading to be in. What characteristics make this space uncomfortable? It’s almost guaranteed that several of those characteristics are apart of outdated shelters and low-income housing developments – harsh lighting, uncomfortable furniture, narrow corridors, and an overall impersonal essence felt throughout the space. As if to say, this building is purely for function with no regard for the user’s well-being in mind.
Transitional and permanent housing lacking in the quality design needed for improved mental and physical health creates one of the many challenges that contribute to the prolongation of houselessness. Meaning, the spaces meant to heal, are more likely to induce stress and anxiety rather than to alleviate it. Understanding this is relationship between mental health and space is why current supportive and affordable housing developments have entered an innovative wave, where the user represents more than a unit occupied.
A study done by the California Policy Lab found that, “Health and behavioral health care needs, and experiences of abuse and trauma, are major factors in loss of housing among unsheltered people, most especially for unsheltered women,” with 80% of unsheltered women experiencing abuse and trauma in their lifetime (CA Policy Lab 2019). Furthermore, experiencing homelessness, or living in an inadequate shelter, only further exacerbates the trauma experienced. It is irresponsible to expect a human to heal and become empowered without a safe and comfortable living environment. The argument that the form and function of where one lives matters can be supported by neuroscientist Fred Gage, who states, “Although the brain controls our behavior and genes control brain structure, the environment can modulate the function of genes and ultimately the structure of the brain, and therefore can change our behavior. The architectural design changes our brains and behavior,” (NIH 2018).
Given the effect the built environment has on the human brain, able to make one’s life better or worse, all spaces, especially livable ones, must be designed with the user’s history and current experience in mind. The supportive and affordable housing developments of today are using this neuroscience research to build spaces that ensure the occupants have decency and improved mental health in their living environment. That’s where trauma-informed design (TID) comes in. This design tactic has 4 characteristics that are taken into account when developing a space for individuals who have experienced trauma: Collaboration & Community, Choice & Empowerment, Safety & Trust, and Beauty & Joy. Each characteristic has overlapping ways in which design can act accordingly (shown in the chart below).
Examples of the design opportunities that can take place include (but are not limited to); allowing occupants to choose their own paint colors, having spaces that incorporate as much natural light as possible, creating clear lines of sight and an open floor plan in common spaces, making nature easily accessible, encouraging elements of cultural expression that take into account the target community and context, providing furniture that is lightweight and movable (…) more can be found here. Such design implementations are necessary, as individuals with trauma can experience triggers in their environment that can cause further detriment to their mental health. Failed practices of having a window look into a neighbor’s living space, utilizing dark and/or limited paint colors, limiting decorative and personal elements, and having harsh lighting, make for an unsuitable environment for improving one’s overall health.
If all it takes is adjusting the design of a building according to TID standards, then it is without question to implement such design for the betterment and empowerment of the occupants in both supportive and affordable housing. Everyone deserves better, and it is up to those with the ability to make a difference to uplift communities who are less fortunate to make that change for themselves. Starting with getting people into dignified housing will allow for such populations to improve their mental and physical health, in-turn allowing them to stay housed longer-rather than entering back into the systemic cycle of incarceration and/or houselessness.
Written by: Megan Weller
Jan 18, 2024
Leave a Reply Cancel reply